Recommendations, apply to, and candidate sex within the You

Recommendations, apply to, and candidate sex within the You

101 . Newhagen , John E. , “Beyond care about-report: Playing with latency to respond to model practical question reacting procedure towards the web-centered public opinion surveys,” regarding Sourcebook to own Governmental Correspondence Browse , eds. Bucy , Erik P. and you can Lance Holbert , Roentgen. ( Nyc : Routledge , 2011 ).Yahoo Student

102 . Oxley , Douglas Roentgen. , Smith , Kevin B. , Alford , John Roentgen. , Hibbing , Matthew V. , Miller , Jennifer L. , Scalora , Mario , Hatemi , Peter K. , and you may Hibbing , John Roentgen. , “Political perceptions will vary with emotional characteristics,” Research , 321 : 1667 – 1670 .CrossRefGoogle Student

103 . Swers , Michele L. , “Try female likely to choose to own ladies’ factors expense than simply its male colleagues?” Legislative Degree Quarterly 1998 , 23 : 435 – 448 .CrossRefGoogle Student

104 . Swers , Michele L. , The difference Female Make: The policy Impression of women inside Congress ( Chi town : School away from il Drive , 2002 ).Yahoo Student

105 . Hill , Kim Quaile and you may Hurley , Patricia Good. , “A symbol speeches regarding U.S. Senate in addition to their representational ramifications,” Journal of Government 2002 , 64 : 219 – 231 .CrossRefGoogle Pupil

108 . Mansbridge , Jane , “Is blacks represent blacks and you will female portray female? A contingent ‘yes’,” Log out-of Government 1999 , 61 ( step 3 ): 627 – 657 .CrossRefGoogle Beginner

sweet sexy taiwanese women

109 . Sanbonmatsu , Kira , “Gender-associated governmental education together with descriptive icon of females,” Political Conclusion 2003 , twenty-five : 367 – 388 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

110 . Dolan , Kathleen , “Will there be an effective ‘gender affinity effect’ in the American government? S. Domestic elections,” Governmental Browse Quarterly 2008 , 61 : 79 – 89 .CrossRefGoogle Beginner

This information has been cited by following the e-books. It listing is created considering investigation provided by Crossref.

Benstead, Lindsay J. Jamal, Amaney Good. and Crave, Ellen 2015. Will it be Gender, Religiosity otherwise One another? A task Congruity Principle off Candidate Electability in the Transformation Tunisia. Viewpoints to the Government, Vol. thirteen, Procedure. 1, p. 74.

Bauer, Nichole Yards. 2015. Just who stereotypes female individuals? Identifying personal differences in women stereotype dependence. Government, Organizations, and Identities, Vol. 3, Thing. 1, p. 94.

Rosenthal , Cindy Simon , “The latest role out-of gender in the detailed symbolization,” Political Browse Every quarter 1995 , forty-eight : 599 – 611

McLaughlin, Bryan Davis, Catasha Coppini, David Kim, More youthful Mie Knisely, Sandra and you can McLeod, Douglas 2015. When female attack. Government plus the Life Sciences, Vol. 34, Material. 1, p. 44.

Pyeatt, Nicholas L. and Yanus, Alixandra B. 2016. Giving combined indicators: the new role regarding gender and partisanship within the recommendations out of political leaders. Diary of Elections, Public-opinion and Activities, Vol. twenty six, Question. cuatro, p. 423.

Koch, Thomas and you can Obermaier, Magdalena 2016. With Cardiovascular system and you will (No) Mind? Just how Recipients Negatively Infer Lost Details about Political figures and how So it Impacts new Assessment of your Speakermunication Look, Vol. 43, Procedure. eight, p. 972.

Turska-Kawa, Agnieszka and you will Olszanecka-. Stereotypes Choosing Attitudes away from Women Political figures: Happening off Poland. Politics from inside the Central Europe, Vol. 14, Question. step three, p. seven.

Schneider, Monica C. and you can Bos, Angela L. 2019. The utilization of Societal Character Theory towards Study of Gender in the Government. Governmental Psychology, Vol. 40, Point. S1, p. 173.

Park, Sunshine Young and you can Baek, Young Min 2019. Citizens’ Ambivalence on the Feminine Political leaders: Why Ambivalence Issues to own Gender Equivalence within the a great Democracy. Log of females, Government & Rules, Vol. forty, Question. dos, p. 309.

Rusidze, Nino 2019. Stereotypes, Profile Assassination and you will Feamales in Government. Corvinus Journal out-of In the world Affairs, Vol. 4, Procedure. 1, p. fifteen.

Aaldering, Loes and you can Van Der Pas, Daphne Joanna 2020. Political Management regarding the Media: Gender Bias from inside the Frontrunner Stereotypes during Venture and you may Regime Minutes. United kingdom Record out of Political Science, Vol. fifty, Procedure. 3, p. 911.

Boer, Noortje 2020. How can Owners Evaluate Road?Height Bureaucrats’ Enthusiasm and you will Skills? A beneficial Typology and Decide to try. Societal Government Review, Vol. 80, Question. cuatro, p. 532.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *